@article {3093042,
	title = {Disrupting the system constructively: Testing the effectiveness of nonnormative nonviolent collective action},
	journal = {J Pers Soc Psychol},
	volume = {121},
	number = {4},
	year = {2021},
	note = {1939-1315Shuman, EricOrcid: 0000-0003-3830-4926Saguy, TamarOrcid: 0000-0002-0989-0615van Zomeren, MartijnHalperin, EranRuderman Family Foundation/Arison Foundation/Journal ArticleUnited States2020/08/14J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Oct;121(4):819-841. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000333. Epub 2020 Aug 13.},
	month = {Oct},
	pages = {819-841},
	edition = {20200813},
	abstract = {Collective action research tends to focus on motivations of the disadvantaged group, rather than on which tactics are effective at driving the advantaged group to make concessions to the disadvantaged. We focused on the potential of nonnormative nonviolent action as a tactic to generate support for concessions among advantaged group members who are resistant to social change. We propose that this tactic, relative to normative nonviolent and to violent action, is particularly effective because it reflects constructive disruption: a delicate balance between disruption (which can put pressure on the advantaged group to respond) and perceived constructive intentions (which can help ensure that the response to action is a conciliatory one). We test these hypotheses across 4 contexts (total N = 3650). Studies 1-3 demonstrate that nonnormative nonviolent action (compared with inaction, normative nonviolent action, and violent action) is uniquely effective at increasing support for concessions to the disadvantaged among resistant advantaged group members (compared with advantaged group members more open to social change). Study 3 shows that constructive disruption mediates this effect. Study 4 shows that perceiving a real-world ongoing protest as constructively disruptive predicts support for the disadvantaged, whereas Study 5 examines these processes longitudinally over 2 months in the context of an ongoing social movement. Taken together, we show that nonnormative nonviolent action can be an effective tactic for generating support for concessions to the disadvantaged among those who are most resistant because it generates constructive disruption. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).},
	keywords = {*Motivation, *Social Change, Aggression, Humans, intention, Vulnerable Populations},
	isbn = {0022-3514},
	author = {Shuman, E. and Saguy, T. and van Zomeren, M. and Halperin, E.}
}
